Ultrahigh strength ductile microalloyed steel with a very low yield ratio developed by quenching and partitioning heat treatment

Abstract

In this study, a microalloyed low carbon steel was subjected to quenching and partitioning (Q&P) heat treatment processes. The primary ferrite-pearlite microstructure of the steel was transformed into a bainitic microstructure containing interlath and sporadic blocks of retained austenite. The applied heat treatment process partitioned the carbon into the retained austenite to a weight percentage of 0.136. The microalloyed low-carbon steel acquired a continuous yield with high yield strength, a gigapascal level of ultimate tensile strength (i.e., ~ 1.1 GPa), and a very low yield ratio (i.e., 0.55) while retaining reasonable ductility and toughness when compared to the preheat-treated values.

Introduction

Microalloyed steels are in high demand in industries, including oil and gas transportation sectors as well as automobile industries. Alloying elements affects the phase transformation behavior during processing and ensues better mechanical properties1^,2^,3. Demand by the oil and gas transportation pipeline industry for steel with better mechanical properties, mainly strength and toughness, for more effective and efficient oil and gas transportation has led to the development of a series of pipeline steels. These mechanical properties of steels are derived from the manipulation of microstructure through composition optimization4^,5, thermomechanical processing6^,7 and heat treatment8^,9^,10^,11. Thermomechanical and/or heat treatment processing transforms the ferrite-pearlite banded microstructure into various phases and/or morphologies, including polygonal ferrite, quasi-polygonal ferrite, granular-bainitic ferrite, bainitic ferrite and acicular ferrite2^,12. Among these polygonal ferrite (recrystallized smooth boundary large equiaxed grain) is the softest, while acicular ferrite (fine grain with islands of quasi-polygonal, granular bainitic ferrite and bainitic ferrite) is the strongest with reasonable ductility. Although in these cases the processed microstructure typically contains more than one of the phases. The heat treatment process involves heating for partial or full austenization followed by a continuous or isothermal quenching to a lower temperature for projected phase transformation. Quenching and partitioning (Q&P) is a relatively new concept of heat treatment13, where the fully or partially austenized steel is quenched to martensite formation temperature and continues to anneal to facilitate carbon partitioning from martensite to retained austenite without carbide formation. Carbon enriched austenite stabilizes at room temperature and consequentially induce simultaneous improvement in the strength and ductility of the steel. This quenching and partitioning procedure was initially proposed and then widely used on medium carbon steel and was latter also applied to low carbon transformation induced plasticity steel14 and pipeline steel 11. In the present study, we used quenching and partitioning heat treatment on microalloyed low carbon pipeline grade steel API X65 in order to study the effect on microstructure and mechanical properties.

Results and discussion

The carbon equivalent for the low carbon microalloyed steel (see Table 1) was calculated using the ItoBessyo formula15 to a value of 0.168. It should be noted that the Ito-Bessyo formula {i.e., CEP(CM)=C+Si30+Mn20+Cu20+Ni60+Cr20+Mo15+V10+5B}{i.e., CEP(CM)=C+Si30+Mn20+Cu20+Ni60+Cr20+Mo15+V10+5B} is applicable to calculate the carbon equivalent for steel with a carbon content less than 0.12 weight percentage and it is also called the ‘parameter for cracking measurement’. The martensite transformation start temperature, MS (°C), was estimated using the empirical formulae proposed by Andrews16 ⎧⎩⎨i.e.,MS (∘C)=539−423C−30.4Mn−12.1Cr−17.7Ni−7.5Mo+10.0Co−7.5Si⎫⎭⎬{i.e.,MS (∘C)=539−423C−30.4Mn−12.1Cr−17.7Ni−7.5Mo+10.0Co−7.5Si}, and Seo et al.17 ⎧⎩⎨i.e.,MS (∘C)=764.2−302.6C−30.6Mn−14.5Si−8.9Cr−16.6Ni+2.4Mo−1.3Cu+8.58Co+7.4W⎫⎭⎬{i.e.,MS (∘C)=764.2−302.6C−30.6Mn−14.5Si−8.9Cr−16.6Ni+2.4Mo−1.3Cu+8.58Co+7.4W}, to be 457 °C and 464 °C, respectively. These theoretical values for the martensitic transformation start temperature closely matched the value determined using JMatPro® software. The critical temperatures (see Fig. 1a) for the microalloyed API X65 steel were determined to be 844.9 °C (the upper critical transformation temperature), 695 °C (the lower critical transformation temperature), 444.7 °C (the martensite transformation start temperature), and 337.3 °C (the martensite transformation end temperature).

Table 1 Chemical composition of the microalloyed low carbon steel.

 

Figure 1

(a) Time–Temperature-Transformation diagram for the microalloyed steel, and (b) the quenching and partitioning heat-treatment cycle used in this study.

 

The applied quenching and partitioning process effectively transformed the microstructure of primary ferrite with sporadic pearlite (see Fig. 2a) of the microalloyed low carbon steel into lath-bainitic ferrite (BF) sheaves with the presence of significant amounts of retained austenite (RA) and/or martensite/austenite (M/A) constituent blocks (see Fig. 2b, c and 3). The parallel arrangement of the acicular shaped ferrite sheaf in low-carbon steel and/or in low-carbon alloy steel is considered upper bainite by Ohtani18, and Bramfitt and Speer 19. The salient features of the bainitic ferrite are (i) nucleation at the austenite boundary (see Fig. 2b), (ii) alignment and elongation in parallel form (see Fig. 2b, c), and (iii) their coexistence with the austenite and/or martensite/austenite constituents (see Fig. 2b, c and Figure 3). All of these were observed in the microstructure.

Figure 2

Optical micrographs showing pre-heat treated ferrite-pearlite microstructure of microalloyed low carbon steel [‘black arrow’ marks pointing to the sporadic pearlite colony in the ferrite matrix] (a) transformed into bainitic ferrite sheaves with retained austenite and/or martensite/austenite constituent [‘RA’ and ‘MA’ represents retained austenite and block of martensite/austenite constituent and are pointed by ‘black arrow in lath bainitic ferrite matrix] due to quench and partitioning heat treatment (b) and (c), respectively.

 

Figure 3

Backscattered electron image showing bainitic ferrite sheaves with retained austenite and/or martensite/austenite constituent due to quench and partitioning heat treatment in different magnification, with carbon concentration profile along the micro-constituents.

 

Upon heating, austenization of the microalloyed steel sample microstructure was initiated when heated to 695 °C (i.e., the lower critical or eutectoid transformation temperature) (see Fig. 1) and completed at temperatures above 844.9 °C (i.e., the upper critical transformation temperature). On the other hand, the heating of the sample at 1150 °C (a temperature much higher than the upper critical temperature) caused dissolution of any potential carbides present in the microstructure, except for titanium carbide, and further it homogenized the alloying elements present. Upon quenching, the nucleation of the bainitic ferrite sheaf was initiated at the austenite grain boundaries followed by inward parallel growth. In the case of steel with very low carbon content, typically the upper bainitic ferrite contains retained austenite between the sheaf instead of carbides2^,3^,19^,20. The microstructural characterization of the quenched and partitioned low carbon microalloyed steel also revealed the existence of untransformed blocky retained austenite and/or martensite/austenite constituents (see Fig. 2c and 3b, c). This phenomena was also reported in the literature for similar materials21^,22. Carbon in the high temperature austenite was anticipated to be partitioned during the austenite-bainite transformation throughout the quenching stage, and further carbon migration toward the retained austenite was likely to be experienced throughout the partitioning stage (see Fig. 3c). It should be noted that previous researches did not report any redistribution or partitioning of substitutional alloying element atoms during the bainitic transformation and growth23^,24. Analysis of the X-ray diffraction results estimated the presence of 19.76 volume percentage of retained austenite with 0.136 weight percentage of carbon content in the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low-carbon steel microstructure. This analysis was conducted using the direct comparison method22^,25 of X-ray diffraction peaks, where the (200)α, and (211)α X-ray diffraction peaks were compared to the (200)γ, (220)γ, and (311)γ peaks (see Fig. 4) for the samples. It should be noted that the carbon content in the retained austenite was much higher than the initial average alloy composition. This higher carbon content and the presence of other alloying elements stabilized the retained austenite and/or martensite/austenite constituents to room temperature 1^,2^,3^,13^,14.

Figure 4

X-ray diffraction peaks of quench and partitioning heat treated microalloyed low carbon steel for ferrite (a) and austenite (b) used to estimate the amount of retained austenite.

Full size image

Mechanical characterization of the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low carbon steel estimated a microhardness value of 275 HV (see Table 2). This could be attributed to the presence of a higher dislocation density in the bainitic ferrite and the number of grain boundaries in the microstructure2^,19^,20. However, it should be noted that this microhardness value for this quench and partitioning heat treated microalloyed low carbon steel remained within the upper limit value suggested for offshore and sour applications26.

Table 2 Mechanical properties of quenching and partitioning heat-treated microalloyed low carbon steel.

 

Transformation in the microstructure led to the phenomena of continuous yield in the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low carbon steel, which is a major shift from the discontinuous yield of low carbon pipeline steel. In addition, this improvement in the strength of the steel led to an ultimate tensile strength to gigapascal level (i.e., ~1.1 GPa) with a very low yield-to-tensile ratio (i.e., 0.55). However, this quench and partitioning heat treated microalloyed low carbon steel retained the initial ductility to a reasonable level (i.e., 18.42 percentage) sufficient for the oil and gas transportation pipeline application (see Fig. 5 and Table 2).

Figure 5

Tensile stress–strain behaviour (inset: strain hardening rate vs true strain) for microalloyed low carbon steel.

 

The superior tensile properties (i.e., both the yield and ultimate tensile strength) were considered to be the results of the microstructural features developed in the steel samples due to the applied quenching and partitioning heat treatment process. The developed microstructural features were also apparently able to stimulate a very large amount of work hardening effect in the microalloyed low carbon steel. Earlier research works in the open literature reported that the inherent presence of a large amount of dislocation in the fine bainite lath is the reason to induce a continuous yield with a significantly high yield strength in a low-carbon steel, which also subsequently triggers an extensive work hardening effect in the material2^,21^,27. The presence of a considerably large amount of retained austenite also provided much higher and incessant strain hardening in the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low carbon steel samples until approximately 11% uniform plastic deformation and resulted into a staggeringly high ~1.1 GPa of ultimate tensile strength. The microvoids in the tensile samples started to nucleate from the presence of (i) extremely fine carbide particles (which led to the formation of fine dimples), and (ii) nonmetallic particles (which led to the formation of large dimples28). Microvoids also nucleated in the tensile sample microstructure from decohesion of the bainite sheaves at the interface with block-retained austenite (which led to the formation of massive elliptical and/or elongated craters28^,29^,30). Presence of all of these three types of dimples and elliptical craters were evident in the quenched and partitioned sample fracture surface as shown in the Fig. 6. The growth of microvoids from the finer size (in the case of the preheat-treated sample, as seen in Fig. 7) to the relatively much larger size dimples of different shapes (in the case of the quenched and partitioned heat-treated sample, as seen in the Figs. 6 and 8) due to their coalescence eventually resulted in the fracture of the sample with an 18.42% elongation.

Figure 6

Tensile stress produced ductile fracture with three types of dimples (i.e., fine, coarse and large elliptical crater) in the quenched and partitioning heat-treated microalloyed low carbon steel.

Full size image

Figure 7

Scanning electron microscopy showing fine dimples dominated ductile fracture surface in pre-heat treated microalloyed low carbon steel.

 

Figure 8

Scanning electron microscopy showing coarse dimples dominated ductile fracture surface in the quenched and partitioning heat treated microalloyed low carbon steel (a)–(c) caused by the presence of fine metalloids (d), respectively.

 

The monotonic decline in the work hardening rate with increasing true strain (inset of Fig. 4) is an indication of the work hardening induced ductility improvement in the quenched and partitioned heat-treated microalloyed low carbon steel. The significantly low yield-to-tensile strength ratio (i.e., 0.55) is an indication of the spectacular enhancement in the resistance to deformation from the yield point to the plastic instability27 of the transformed microstructure of microalloyed low carbon pipeline steel. The room temperature toughness (tensile and impact) of the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low carbon steel remained reasonably high (see Table 2) from the recommended minimum required values. This is despite of the remarkably high strength achieved by the samples due to the quenching and partitioning heat treatment process. In essence, the mechanical properties remained much higher than that required for the oil and gas transportation industries as prescribed by the American Petroleum Institute standards26.

Conclusion

The quenching and partitioning heat treatment process transformed the microalloyed low carbon steel microstructure to lath bainite with interlath and block retained austenite. The retained austenite stabilized to room temperature due to partitioning of carbon into it. The transformed microstructure assimilated a continuous yield with high yield strength, and strong work hardening which resulted in a gigapascal ultimate tensile strength, ensuing a significantly low yield-to-tensile strength ratio. Despite the remarkable strengthening effect, the quenched and partitioned microalloyed low carbon steel retained reasonably high ductility and toughness.

Methods

Materials and heat treatment

A 15.89 mm thick rolled API X65 coil (composition in Table 1) was machined to cylindrical tensile specimens (diameter 6 mm, gauge-length 30 mm) and V-notch Charpy impact test specimens. Samples were heated to 1150 °C for 30 min for full austenization followed by quenching to 340 °C for 10 s, and then partitioning was continued at 440 °C for 10 s prior to quenching to the room temperature. Salt bath was used for the quenching and partitioning heat treatment process. Figure 1 shows the schematic view of the heat treatment cycle used. The critical temperatures (i.e., the upper and lower critical transformation temperatures, and the martensite transformation start and end temperatures) for the microalloyed low carbon steel were determined using JMatPro® software.

Microstructural characterization

Microstructural characterization of the quenching and partitioning heat treatment processed sample was conducted through optical microscopy (OM) (MODEL: Olympus DXS-510 Digital, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (MODEL: Quanta 250 FEG, FEI, Czech Republic) for phase identification and distribution, and X-ray diffraction (MODEL: Bruker AXS D2 PHASER 2nd Gen Diffractometer, USA) for quantification of retained austenite and its carbon content. Samples were metallurgically polished, and etched with 4% nital solution for 5 s. PDXL2 software was used to identify the X-ray diffraction spectrum peaks.

Mechanical characterization

Mechanical characterization of the quenching and partitioning heat treatment processed samples was conducted for microhardness (MODEL: Beuhler MMT-3, USA) and room temperature elongation-to-fracture tensile properties (MODEL: Instron 5569 Universal Testing Machine, Instron, USA). Microhardness values were measured on metallurgically polished samples in accordance with the ASTM E384-18a standard using a load of 500 gf and a dwell time of 10 seconds. Tensile properties were measured in accordance with ASTM E8/E8 M-16ae1 using a machine cross-head speed of 1 mm.min-1. The room temperature toughness of the heat-treated samples was measured using a notched bar impact test (MODEL: Pendulum Impact Tester PSd 300, WMP Leizig, Germany) in accordance with the ASTM E23-18 standard. Scanning electron microscopy was conducted on the tensile fracture surfaces to understand the fracture mechanisms.

References

1. Yan, S., Liu, X., Liang, T., Chen, J. & Zhao, Y. Effect of micro-alloying elements on microstructure and mechanical properties in C-Mn–Si quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steels. Steel Res. Int. 90, 1800257 (2019).

Article Google Scholar 

2. Krauss, G. & Ferritic, T. S. W. Microstructures in continuously cooled low- and ultralow-carbon steels. ISIJ Int. 35, 937–945 (1995).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

3. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. Bainite In Steels- Theory and Practice 3rd edn. (Maney Publishing, 2015).

Google Scholar 

4. Beidokhti, B., Kokabi, A. H. & Dolati, A. A comprehensive study on the microstructure of high strength low alloy pipeline welds. J. Alloys Compd. 597, 142–147 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

5. Terada, Y., Tamehiro, H., Yamashita, M., Ayukawa, N. & Hara, T. Development of API X100 UOE line pipe. Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. 72, 47–52 (1997).

Google Scholar 

6. Zhao, M. C., Yang, K., Xiao, F. R. & Shan, Y. Y. Continuous cooling transformation of undeformed and deformed low carbon pipeline steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355, 126–136 (2003).

Article Google Scholar 

7. Xie, H., Du, L. X., Hu, J. & Misra, R. D. K. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel 1000 MPa grade TMCP low carbon microalloyed steel with combination of high strength and excellent toughness. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 612, 123–130 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

8. Hassan, S. F. & Al-Wadei, H. Heterogeneous microstructure of low carbon microalloyed steel and the mechanical properties. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 29, 7045–7051 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

9. Godefroid, L. B., Senaa, B. M. & Filho, V. B. T. Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of seamless steel pipes API 5 L type obtained by different processes of heat treatments. Mater. Res. 20, 514–522 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

10. Murillo, C. N., Hernández, R. G., Morelos, V. H. L. & Martínez, M. S. Improvement of mechanical properties of API X-65 steel by nonconventional heat treatment. In Materials Characterization, Part III (eds Campos, R. P. et al.) 71–77 (Springer International Publishing. New York, 2015).

Google Scholar 

11. Ma, J., Zhang, X., Cheng, S. & Gao, H. Influence of partitioning process on the microstructure and mechanical properties of high deformability oil-gas pipeline. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2014, 869481 (2014).

Article Google Scholar 

12. Wang, W., Shan, Y. & Yang, K. Study of high strength pipeline steels with different microstructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 502, 38–44 (2009).

Article Google Scholar 

13. Speer, J., Matlock, D. K., De Cooman, B. C. & Schroth, J. G. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta Mater. 51, 2611–2622 (2003).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar 

14. Speer, J. G., Assunção, F. C. R., Matlock, D. K. & Edmonds, D. V. The ‘quenching and partitioning’ process: Background and recent progress. Mater. Res. 8, 417–423 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

15. Ito, Y. & Bessyo, K. Weldability formula of high strength steel related to heat affected zone cracking. J. Japanese Weld. Soc. 37(9), 983–991 (1968).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

16. Andrews, K. W. empirical formulae for the calculation of some transformation temperatures. J. Iron Steel Inst. 203(7), 721–727 (1965).

CAS Google Scholar 

17. Seo, E. U. N. J., Cho, L. & Decooman, B. C. Modified methodology for the quench and partitioning (Q&P) processing of steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47(8), 1–6 (2016).

Article Google Scholar 

18. Ohtani, H., Okaguchi, S., Fujishiro, Y. & Ohmori, Y. Morphology and properties of low-carbon bainite. Metall Trans A 21, 877–888 (1990).

Article Google Scholar 

19. Bramfiti, B. L. & Speer, J. G. A perspective on the morphology of bainite. Metall. Trans. A 21, 818–829 (1990).

Google Scholar 

20. Smirnov, M. A., Pyshmintsev, I. Y. & Boryakova, A. N. Classification of low-carbon pipe steel microstructure. Metallurgist 54, 444–454 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

21. Zhao, L. et al. The combining effects of ausforming and below-Ms or above-Ms austempering on the transformation kinetics, microstructure and mechanical properties of low-carbon bainitic steel. Mater. Des. 183, 108123 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

22. Zhou, M. X., Xu, G., Wang, L. & He, B. Effects of austenitization temperature and compressive stress during bainitic transformation on the stability of retained austenite. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 69, 1–7 (2016).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar 

23. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. & Waugh, A. R. An atom-probe study of bainite. In Solid-Solid Phase Transformations (eds Aaronson, H. I. et al.) (TMS-AIME, 1982).

Google Scholar 

24. Stark, I., Smith, G. D. W. & Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. Distribution of substitutional alloying elements during the bainite transformation. Metall Trans A 21, 837–844 (1990).

Article Google Scholar 

25. Suryanarayana, C. & Norton, M. G. X-ray Diffraction: A Practical Approach (Springer, 1998).

Book Google Scholar 

26. API Specifications 5 L Specifications for Line Pipe (2013) 45^th eds, American Petroleum Institute, Washington.
27. Kim, Y. M., Kim, S. K., Lim, Y. J. & Kim, N. J. Effect of microstructure on the yield ratio and low temperature toughness of linepipe steel. ISIJ Int 42, 1571–1577 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

28. Senior, B. A., Noble, F. W. & Eyre, B. L. The nucleation and growth of voids at carbides in 9Cr-1Mo steel. Acta Metall 34, 1321–1327 (1986).

Article CAS Google Scholar 

29. Yakubtsov, I. A., Poruks, P. & Boyd, J. D. Microstructure and mechanical properties of bainitic low carbon high strength plate steel. Mater Sci Eng A 480, 109–116 (2008).

Article Google Scholar 

30. Chen JH, Kikuta Y, Araki T, Yoneda M, Matsuda Y (1984) Micro-fracture behaviour induced by M–A constituent (Island Martensite) in simulated welding heat affected zone of HT80 high strength low alloyed steel. Acta Metall 32:1779–1788.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia, for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia

S. Fida Hassan & H. AlWadei

2. Interdisciplinary Research Center for Advanced Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia

S. Fida Hassan

Contributions

S.F.H. conceived the idea of the work, and wrote and edited the manuscript. H.A. conducted all the experimental work. S.F.H. and H.A. analyzed and interpreted the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fida Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

 

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.